Skip to content

California Anti-SLAPP Project

Fighting SLAPPs, Protecting the First Amendment

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Information about SLAPPs
    • What is a SLAPP?
    • Defamation, libel, slander…and other common SLAPP disguises.
      • Abuse of Process
      • Defamation
      • Injunction
      • Intentional or Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
      • Interference with Contract or Economic Advantage
      • Invasion of Privacy
      • Malicious Prosecution
      • Nuisance
    • Defending against a SLAPP
    • CyberSLAPPs: Being Sued for Speech Online
    • Have You Received a Subpoena to Reveal Your Identity Online?
  • Consulting Services
    • Consulting Services
    • Testimonials: Fighting SLAPPs with CASP
  • Resources
    • California’s Anti-SLAPP Law and Related Statutes
      • C.C.P. Section 425.16
      • C.C.P. Section 425.17
      • C.C.P. Section 425.18
      • C.C.P. Sections 1987.1 and 1987.2
      • Civil Code Section 47
      • U.S. Code 47 Section 230 (Communications Decency Act)
    • Directories of Cases
      • Cases Involving the California Anti-SLAPP Law
      • First Amendment Related Cases Decided by California Courts
      • First Amendment Cases Decided by the U.S. Supreme Court
    • Notifying the Judicial Council of California
    • First Amendment Resources and Useful Links
  • In the News
  • Contact Us
    • Client Resources

Author: Nikki Moore

Cat Links In the News

Decision Highlights Split in Application of Anti-SLAPP Law

Posted on February 19, 2013February 18, 2021 caspadmin

In Dwight R. v. Christy B., the Court of Appeal recently addressed the application of California’s anti-SLAPP law to allegedly illegal acts.  Some confusion on this issue arises from the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Flatley v. … Read the rest

Cat Links In the News

Faster than a speeding bullet, the right to appeal an anti-SLAPP motion in federal court is instantaneous.

Posted on January 29, 2013February 18, 2021 caspadmin

In DC Comics v. Pac. Pictures Corp., the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirmed the rule that an order ruling on a motion made pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute is immediately appealable in federal court.

In the search for … Read the rest

Cat Links In the News

Sued for Investigative Report, CBS Wins Anti-SLAPP Motion on Appeal

Posted on January 9, 2013February 18, 2021 caspadmin

In Young v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc., the Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District recently reversed a trial court’s decision and granted CBS Broadcasting Inc.’s anti-SLAPP motion.

“A Life Hijacked,” originally aired in 2008, reported on 86-year-old Mary … Read the rest

anti-slapp@casp.net
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Information about SLAPPs
  • Consulting Services
  • Resources
  • In the News
  • Contact Us
Copyright © 2026 California Anti-SLAPP Project | Signify Child by WEN Themes
Scroll Up