Skip to content

California Anti-SLAPP Project

Fighting SLAPPs, Protecting the First Amendment

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Information about SLAPPs
    • What is a SLAPP?
    • Defamation, libel, slander…and other common SLAPP disguises.
      • Abuse of Process
      • Defamation
      • Injunction
      • Intentional or Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
      • Interference with Contract or Economic Advantage
      • Invasion of Privacy
      • Malicious Prosecution
      • Nuisance
    • Defending against a SLAPP
    • CyberSLAPPs: Being Sued for Speech Online
    • Have You Received a Subpoena to Reveal Your Identity Online?
  • Consulting Services
    • Consulting Services
    • Testimonials: Fighting SLAPPs with CASP
  • Resources
    • California’s Anti-SLAPP Law and Related Statutes
      • C.C.P. Section 425.16
      • C.C.P. Section 425.17
      • C.C.P. Section 425.18
      • C.C.P. Sections 1987.1 and 1987.2
      • Civil Code Section 47
      • U.S. Code 47 Section 230 (Communications Decency Act)
    • Directories of Cases
      • Cases Involving the California Anti-SLAPP Law
      • First Amendment Related Cases Decided by California Courts
      • First Amendment Cases Decided by the U.S. Supreme Court
    • Notifying the Judicial Council of California
    • First Amendment Resources and Useful Links
  • In the News
  • Contact Us
    • Client Resources

UCP International Company Limited v. Balsam Brands Inc.

UCP-INTERNATIONAL-CO.-LTD.-v.-Balsam-Brands-Inc.-420-F.-Supp.-3d-966-Dist.-Court-ND-California-2019-Google-ScholarDownload

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
anti-slapp@casp.net
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Information about SLAPPs
  • Consulting Services
  • Resources
  • In the News
  • Contact Us
Copyright © 2025 California Anti-SLAPP Project | Signify Child by WEN Themes
Scroll Up